I guess the relevance of this approach would depend heavily on how prepared they were to expose hires to this sort of interrogation, and how widespread it was. I have my own.sceptical view, but recruiting people based on tech ability and then having them crumble every time they were questioned is a bad hr choice. On Apr 29, 2013 7:38 PM, "Dennis Williams" <oracledba.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Back in 96 when Microsoft was the most desired company to work for, a team > director Jim McCarthy would end the long interviews and practice coding > sessions with an interview where he would ask only one question: "Tell me > why I should hire you. You've got 10 minutes." Then he would criticize > every word, barking that their answers were unconvincing, canned or > insincere. Trying to rattle the candidate and see how they behave under > stress. > I'm guessing this might be a good technique for hiring the next vice > president, but I'm skeptical of its value in selecting good technical > candidates. Or maybe hiring the guy who will respond to the vice-presidents > when the database is down while the real technical experts fix the system. > Dennis Williams > > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l