RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
- From: "Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)" <Thomas.Mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ganstadba@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:59:48 -0400
LOL!!!!!
"Fragmentation and Stuff".
Third World Database.
Vapor-Ware.
--------------------------------------------------------
This transmission may contain confidential, proprietary, or privileged
information which is intended solely for use by the individual or entity to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying or distribution of this
transmission or its attachments is strictly prohibited. In addition,
unauthorized access to this transmission may violate federal or State law,
including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1985. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the transmission and its attachments.
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael McMullen
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 10:27 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
OMG, let me get my raincoat and umbrella out because I think a s*&t
storm is coming.
----- Original Message -----
From: Guerra, Abraham J <mailto:AGUERRA@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Jared Still <mailto:jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stvsmth@xxxxxxxxx ; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
Well, the only reason I would do colds is that the database is
shut nicely and do not have to keep the archivelogs produced during the
backup... also, shutting down the database once in a while avoids having
problems with the fragmentation of the shared pool and stuff like
that...
Abraham Guerra
-----Original Message-----
Other related posts:
