RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
- From: "Paul Vincent" <Paul.Vincent@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:25:34 +0100
Yes, I know. And now Oracle have messed it about and gone their own way
with it. But when someone wants to know how to implement OFA on an
Oracle installation, they go with the Oracle party line on OFA, if they
want a quiet life, however much this may offend the purity of the
original concept. Yes?
Paul Vincent
Oracle DBA (but not quite *that* dim)
UCE Birmingham
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carel-Jan Engel [mailto:cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 08 August 2006 15:09
> To: Paul.Vincent@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
>
> JFYI: Cary 'invented' OFA.
>
> Regards, Carel-Jan
>
> ===
> If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===
>
>
> > So I don't know which OFA spec Cary's referring to - his
> link was to a
> > document dated 1995, so I think I'd be more inclined to put
> my faith
> > in the Oracle publication from June 2006. Or is it a case of "well,
> > there's OFA, then there's OFA..."?
> >
> > Paul Vincent
> > Oracle DBA (but not a very hot one)
> > UCE Birmingham
> >
>
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
