Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- From: hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: salem.ghassan@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:12:26 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Ghassan
I am not saying its better then DG or worse off its
just that in this particular case somehow it makes
more sense to have Disk based replication then DG.
Also in another forum a poster JH Martin mentioned
that i should be looking into incremental backup and
then applying i to image copies at a remote site which
i guess makes more sense here.
regards
Hrishy
___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- From: Ghassan Salem
Other related posts:
- » Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- » RE: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- Re: Disaster Recovery for datawarehouse
- From: Ghassan Salem