RE: ASM Record Deletions
- From: "goran bogdanovic" <goran00@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 09:34:23 +0200
Hi Mark,
I think is necessary since CSS is (among other things) the foundation for
interprocess communication in a cluster environment and as such used to
handle interaction between ASM instance and regular instance also in single
instance env.
Regards,
Goran
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: ASM Record Deletions
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:00:08 -0400
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Does anyone know why does single instance w/ ASM require the CSS
component?
-Mark
--
Mark J. Bobak
Senior Oracle Architect
ProQuest Information & Learning
Ours is the age that is proud of machines that can think and suspicious
of men who try to. --H. Mumford Jones, 1892-1980
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Closson
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:50 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: ASM Record Deletions
>>>Now regarding CSS. In my understanding it has nothing to do
with association of diskgroup to ASM instance. As I mentioned this is
controlled by you or ASM instance at startup base on init.ora
parameter ASM_DISKGROUPS. What CSS is tracking is association between
database instance and ASM instance that it's connected to.
not to be picky, but CSS has nothing to do with ASM to instance
association...CSS is mrely voting...the involved bits are CRS and OCR.
ATONTI, out
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
