Re: 10g on Linux
- From: zhu chao <zhuchao@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 10:16:31 +0800
Is the performance good when you configure such huge data buffer on a
32bit linux?
We tried redhat 2.1as /9203 , using shmfs + big data cache does not
give better performance .
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:22:39 -0400, Goulet, Dick <dgoulet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh joy, I'm burning one for a server that just froze.
>
> Dick Goulet
> Senior Oracle DBA
> Oracle Certified 8i DBA
> Regards
Zhu Chao
www.cnoug.org
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- RE: 10g on Linux
- From: Goulet, Dick
Other related posts:
- » 10g on Linux
- » Re: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » Re: 10g on Linux
- » Re: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » Re: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » Re: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- » RE: 10g on Linux
- RE: 10g on Linux
- From: Goulet, Dick