Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- From: "Alex Gorbachev" <gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: orclwzrd@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 20:53:41 +0200
John,
I personally fully agree on this one but any particular examples of what is
"too unmanageable, too unstable, too costly in terms of time".
Thanks,
Alex
2006/4/5, John D Parker <orclwzrd@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> It's just too unmanageable, too unstable, too costly in terms of time. Any
> flavor *ix is better.
>
- References:
- Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- From: David Sharples
- Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- From: John D Parker
Other related posts:
- » 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- » Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- From: David Sharples
- Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- From: John D Parker