Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS

oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx gravou em 2006-04-07 15:27:29:

> On 4/6/06, Mogens Nørrgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We have a 
> number of RAC customers on Windows, and I'm not sure they have
> fewer or more problems than Unix/Linux RAC installations.
> 
> It doesn't matter, really. Windows is chosen because it's easier to find
> people to manage it. It becomes harder and harder to find VMS, Unix and 
> Linux administrators these days.
> 
> And Windows might not be as good in some respects as Linux, but it
> doesn't matter if it's good enough.
> 
> So while I HATE monopolies and companies (private or public) abusing 
> monopolistic positions (and that has often included Microsoft, IBM and
> Oracle for that matter), I do have to answer 'Windows' when an IT
> director asks me - unless he already has a history and the people in his
> organisation to use Linux.

        You sound self-contradicting.

        If it doesn't matter, really, why help perpetuate the monopoly? 
Why foster the use of black boxen?


-- 
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
Administrador de Bases de Dados      +55 (11) 4390 5383
Toyota do Brasil Ltda              ldutra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
São Bernardo do Campo, SP                        BRASIL
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: