Re: Patching doubt--Need advice
- From: "Apps DBA" <dbaorapps@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ora-apps-dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:51:51 +0530
Hello Yury/all,
I already queried ad_bugs but could not find that particular bug_number.
My question was is it necessary that the bug number should be inside the
superceeded patch?. My friend says that you can proceed with the other
patch...please clarify.
Thanks,
Rag
On 8/14/07, Jurijs Velikanovs <j.velikanovs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Just check select * from ad_bugs where <?patch number?> = "4337683"
> Check for 11i.AD.I.3 and 11i.AD.I.4
>
> Jurijs
>
> On 8/14/07, Na'eem <naim.deen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi
> > If it is superseded and you have that patch level or patch on your
> instance
> > ,no need to apply .
> > That superseded patch i.e AD.I.4 will already contains that patch.
> >
> > Regards
> > Naim
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/14/07, Apps DBA <dbaorapps@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi gurus,
> > >
> > > I have a patch 4337683--exists for Sun Solaris 32 bit in metalink---
> But
> > this is implicitly superseded by 11i.AD.I.3 and our existed patch_level
> in
> > TEST instance is 11i.AD.I.4.
> > > My question is , I am not able to see the patch number 4337683 in my
> > instance though my patch level is superceeded to AD.I.4. This patch is a
> > pre-requisite to main patch. Can any one advice me does it necessary
> that
> > this bug number includes in the higher patch level?. Or should I need to
> > apply it in its absence.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rag
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Yury
> +371 29268222 (+2 GMT)
> ============================================
> http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html
>
>
Other related posts:
