Re: Patching doubt--Need advice
- From: "Anant (DBA)" <shastry17@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ora-apps-dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:22:06 +0530
Naim,
Is it not necessary that this bug number should exists?. He says that he is
unable to see the bug number after querying it, we know he can proceed if
the patch level is higher than what is required. Please suggest...even i
have a doubt on this.
Thanks,
Ann
On 8/14/07, Na'eem <naim.deen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi
> If it is superseded and you have that patch level or patch on your
> instance ,no need to apply .
> That superseded patch i.e AD.I.4 will already contains that patch.
>
> Regards
> Naim
>
>
> On 8/14/07, Apps DBA <dbaorapps@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi gurus,
> >
> > I have a patch 4337683--exists for Sun Solaris 32 bit in metalink--- But
> > this is implicitly superseded by 11i.AD.I.3 and our existed patch_level
> > in TEST instance is 11i.AD.I.4.
> > My question is , I am not able to see the patch number 4337683 in my
> > instance though my patch level is superceeded to AD.I.4. This patch is a
> > pre-requisite to main patch. Can any one advice me does it necessary that
> > this bug number includes in the higher patch level?. Or should I need to
> > apply it in its absence.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rag
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
