[optimal] Re: The OIS Eye Scan digital system
- From: Richard Press <eyeimager1@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:12:31 -0400
Thank for your valuable input.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:35 PM, CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center <
cpmceyelab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, and will be sharing them in Orlando. Not ready for Optimal
> discussion. After the SS, would be happy to discuss further with you or
> anyone.****
>
> ** **
>
> *Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, ROUB, CDOS, FOPS*****
>
> *Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center*****
>
> *CPMC Department of Ophthalmology*****
>
> *2100 Webster Street Suite 212***
>
> *San Francisco CA 94115*****
>
> *(415) 600-3937 FAX (415) 600-6563*****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Richard Press
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 29, 2011 10:05 AM
>
> *To:* optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [optimal] Re: The OIS Eye Scan digital system****
>
> ** **
>
> That's encouraging. Do you have opinions in this OIS Eye Scan?****
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:48 PM, CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center <
> cpmceyelab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:****
>
> I will be presenting an overview of the newest hand held devices in Orlando
> at the SS this year****
>
> ****
>
> *Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, ROUB, CDOS, FOPS*****
>
> *Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center*****
>
> *CPMC Department of Ophthalmology*****
>
> *2100 Webster Street Suite 212*****
>
> *San Francisco CA 94115*****
>
> *(415) 600-3937 FAX (415) 600-6563*****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *George Henry, CRA, PBT
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:49 AM
> *To:* optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [optimal] Re: The OIS Eye Scan digital system****
>
> ****
>
> Yes, I just tested the system a few weeks ago, and was pretty impressed
> with it. My only real concern would be how the modules/mount would hold up
> with all the swapping in a high-volume setting. We were looking at it for
> an off-site screening type of setting where the volume would be lower. Half
> the cost of a conventional fundus camera-based digital angiography system,
> very portable, and also can be used hand-held.****
>
> ****
>
> George E. Henry, CRA, PBT
> Wheaton Eye Clinic, Ltd.****
>
> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> protected health information that is of a sensitive nature, and may be used
> only by the person or entity to which it is addressed subject to applicable
> law. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, the reader
> is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail
> immediately.****
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Richard Press
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:19
> *To:* OPS
> *Subject:* [optimal] The OIS Eye Scan digital system****
>
> ****
>
> Fellow optimalers,****
>
> Has anybody have any experience with the OIS Eye Scan digital portable
> system for basic angiography and color fundus imaging ?****
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1520/3926 - Release Date: 09/29/11***
> *
>
> ** **
>
Other related posts:
