Richard- We had one in a couple of months ago, and were very pleased. We used it in the clinic, and then in the OR for pediatric exams. We have had concerns with the RetCam and it's lack of imaging upgrades over the past 15 years ( still the same resolution) and have been looking for a replacement/backup for quite a while now. Certainly, the EyeScan is not a direct replacement, but the FAs and color fundus imaging we were able to get after just 2 cases in the OR were enough to make us buy the EyeScan system. The fact that other modalities can possibly be added in the future, due to. He modular nature of the design, is only icing on the cake. Like a good SLR system, let me invest in the body/ccd once, and simply buy more lenses ( modules) as I need them or they become available - it's about time an ophthalmic camera company thinks ahead. As far as construction, servos and modular lenses have been used in "normal" professional cameras for decades, so I would think that the bits used in the EyeScan will hold up well to use, and after two days of testing it showed nothing to make me think otherwise. There were absolutely no glaring issues in our use of it, and the main limitation we saw was viewing angle, which was expected, and which (potentially) could be solved with another lens in the future. But one cannot argue with the quality of the images, relative ease of use, and quality of the database/software when compared with any other portable (OR-capable) imaging system available on the US market. Drs. Shields were impressed with it's capability v. price and also with the fact that it has taken so long to get something like this on the market. They are accustomed to the versatility of the SLR cameras we use daily in the clinic and OR, and to see that same idea come to fundus imaging was kind of a "duh!" moment. -sandor Sandor Ferenczy, CRA, OCTc Ocular Oncology Service Wills Eye Institute 840 Walnut Street, 14th Floor Philadelphia, Pa 19107 www.fighteyecancer.com On Sep 29, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Richard Press <eyeimager1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fellow optimalers, > Has anybody have any experience with the OIS Eye Scan digital portable system > for basic angiography and color fundus imaging ?