Are you saying GoogleTV is misusing the internet? I always thought Google had more of a philosophy of openness and sharing. But perhaps I'm wrong. I imagine the only need for the closed, proprietary systems is because of certain patents and the content provider's desire to make money from their programming without letting the world share it. (But lately, I heard through a reliable source that Google has taken on some unjust projects in foreign lands just for the money.) Personally, while I like the idea of an internet connection in the display, if it requires closed-in systems and content negotiations, I would rather they be in the STB than in the display. I would rather swap out a set-top box than have to buy a new display every time I wanted to go to an new content provider. Dan From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:32:18 -0500 Subject: [opendtv] Study Shows IPTV Gaining Ground Initially, I thought that "IPTV" was starting to mean any Internet-connected TV, these days. But then I got to this part: "'It has been a long, challenging journey so far, especially with new competitors like Google TV joining the battle,' said Gray. 'Set makers will have to acquire new skills such as negotiating content deals in order to succeed.'" It's obvious to me. Misuse a medium, and the solution becomes difficult. These guys are misusing the Internet. Simple as that. Google is trying to re-create the proprietary set-top box MVPD model for Internet appliances. And the worst part is, clueless consumers will let them get away with it. Bert ------------------------------