[opendtv] Re: Spam Filter?
- From: Tom Barry <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:56:18 -0500
1080p displays are so dense that (at normal viewing distances ;-) ) it
doesn't look too bad if you just scale and offset 540p for your 1080i.
The upconversion to 1080p@60 doesn't have much to do with interlace as
far as the frame rate change. It's usually more a way of dealing with
Hollywood's 24p movies. Until they really get the motion compensated
conversion right, IMHO, they should just support display at 24 FPS on
fixed pixel (non-blinking) displays and call it good. It would look
more "film like".
- Tom
Tom McMahon wrote:
> It's amazing how many technology demos I saw at CES 2005 that were trying to
> rectify the problems with interlace on
> inherently-progressive displays (and also upconversion to 1080/60P) by trying
> to make it work at consumer price points at the
> receiver/display end. Some made the pain less visible, but none solved the
> problem entirely - especially when things are moving.
> They should just pay the big bucks to do a best-effort deinterlace at the
> head-end and get it over with (or produce progressive).
> But then that bankrupt Table 3 would get in the way. What a mess.
>
> Wait - where have I heard that before....
>
> It is interesting to note that H.264/AVC has much improved interlace tools
> that help mitigate the gas-guzzling problem, but improved
> codec performance for the transmission channel does nothing for the display
> problem.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Dale Kelly
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:29 PM
> To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [opendtv] Re: Spam Filter?
>
> Good one John!
>
> *Interlace* does indeed seems be p'graphic to some progressives on our list!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Golitsis" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:53 PM
> Subject: [opendtv] Re: Spam Filter?
>
>
>
>>Well, you did say "1080i" and that might have triggered the language
>>filter on
>>Craig's, Tom McMahon's, or Doug McDonald's email system.
>>
>>;)
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Dale Kelly" <dalekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>>Any thoughts on why that might have happened?
>>
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>>
>>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>>FreeLists.org
>>
>>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
