>What makes you think that is the correct aspect ratio? > >I didn't say it was correct, just much more pleasing to >watch on a 40 inch 16:9 TV because it makes full use of the TV >screen, > Well, if that's the criterion, then since the VAST majority of TV sets in the U.S. are 4:3, a narrower aspect ratio makes full use of many more screens. >All this is to say that there is much more that could have been seen of >the original film on ABC tonight if they had >played the DVD I was running and making scene by scene comparisons with. >There would have been more of the original frame, and greater detail >overall by playing the DVD. > > As I pointed out in my correction to my message, the "original frame" of a VistaVision movie is much closer to 4:3 than to 16:9. The specification was 1.472 x 0.997 inches. That's 1.42:1. 4:3 is 1.33:1. 16:9 is 1.78:1. The DVD, by truncating the top and bottom, offers much LESS of the original frame than a 4:3 extraction would by truncating tiny amounts of the sides. In fact, VistaVision vertical "flat" release prints had a full 4:3 aspect ratio. All other aspect ratios truncated top and bottom. Only if ABC somehow started with a widescreen extraction and truncated the sides would they have offered less of the original frame. Your next comment suggests they may have done that. >What ABC aired showed about 1/3 less of the frame horizontally than is >on the DVD, and what is >on the DVD is certainly not the entire original 8 perf 2:1 VistaVision >camera negative frame. > > If so, then I share your condemnation. TTFN, Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.