[opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:01:57 -0400
At 11:23 AM -0700 10/21/07, Dale Kelly wrote:
John W. responded to Craig:
Wireless mics are licensed, so you start off from an absurd point
of view. No need to read further.
In addition, each broadcast market, or geographic area, has a local
frequency coordinator. This is often a Society of Broadcast Engineers (SBE)
function and is sanctioned by the FCC. Licensed users of the broadcast
auxiliary services (BAS), Satellite uplinks and vacant TV channel RF
devices, such as wireless mics, must obtain specific frequency usage
authorization thru coordination. Without this oversight it would be RF
chaos, particularly in the major markets.
Thanks for the info about the frequency coordinators Dale. I was not
aware that wireless Mics require licensing, although the info I am
finding on the web suggests that the FCC does not enforce the
licensing requirement.
As I suspected, there is no licensing requirement for medical
telemetry devices that share the broadcast spectrum, however, the
devices must be approved under the rules for their use, and they must
be registered with the local frequency coordinator:
From
http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=licensing&id=wireless_medical_telemetry
Licensing
WMTS operators do not have to apply for licenses from the FCC. In
order to be authorized under the FCC's rules, a WMTS operator is
required only to use equipment that is properly authorized under the
rules and to register with the designated frequency coordinator.
This all makes sense, and given traditional practices I can
understand why broadcasters are concerned about the potential for
interference. It is also clear that there are many instances of
unauthorized use of devices that share broadcast spectrum; wireless
microphones are a frequently cited example. Many small shops use
wireless mics and may use their gear in multiple markets. I can see
where registration and coordination could get very bothersome and
wonder what percentage of users actually work with local frequency
coordinators.
For what it is worth, the rules for Medical telemetry devices are
written in a manner that suggests that interference with broadcasters
is not the real issue. The rules state that these devices are not
protected from interference by licensed users. So I suspect that in
the real world, people find a frequency that works, perhaps with the
assist of a local TV guide.
There were numerous hits about problems with Medical Telemetry
devices in the 1998 time frame when new DTV transmitters were being
turned on; the FDA issued a warning to users about the new DTV
stations in 1998.
This suggests that these devices are installed, using an available
frequency that is not being used by local stations. If a new station
uses that frequency it can cause problems for the telemetry devices,
and indeed it did in a few markets in 1998.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- From: John Willkie
- References:
- [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- From: Dale Kelly
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- » [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
John W. responded to Craig:
Wireless mics are licensed, so you start off from an absurd point of view. No need to read further.
In addition, each broadcast market, or geographic area, has a local frequency coordinator. This is often a Society of Broadcast Engineers (SBE) function and is sanctioned by the FCC. Licensed users of the broadcast auxiliary services (BAS), Satellite uplinks and vacant TV channel RF devices, such as wireless mics, must obtain specific frequency usage authorization thru coordination. Without this oversight it would be RF chaos, particularly in the major markets.
LicensingWMTS operators do not have to apply for licenses from the FCC. In order to be authorized under the FCC's rules, a WMTS operator is required only to use equipment that is properly authorized under the rules and to register with the designated frequency coordinator.
- [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- From: John Willkie
- [opendtv] Re: Did I get this one right?
- From: Dale Kelly