Hi Rui, Many thanks for your answers. in-body reply: On Thu 04/09/14,01:01, Rui Batista wrote: > > On Fri 18/07/14,12:07, Mesar Hameed wrote: > >> Hi Rui, > >> > >> If I have read the code correctly, the modifications in features/tools > >> looks good, and are cleaner than the > >> t2694, t2694-2 and next branches. > > Yes. Actually I wanted to merge feature/tools into next but didn’t do it, > don’t recall exactly why. I have gone ahead and merged it into master. > >> I suggest deleting these three, and wait until 2014.3 is out, after > >> which we can merge/role out the updated template for the addons. > > Sure. Probably feature/tools should readily replace next and merge into > master as soon as 2014.3 roles out. Do you agree that branches t2694, t2694-2 and next should now be deleted? I hope I didn't overlook some functionality. > >> Updating/releasing the addons is not a fast process, so the more we can > >> agree on and implement the better, so that we don't have to iterate over > >> too many template updates. Other than the better markdown branch which isn't quite completed/ready for merging, do you have any other improvements in mind for the template before we start roling it out? thanks, Mesar
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
