[nvda-addons] Re: RFC: don't use the repository README as add-on user documentation (was) Re: Re: Configobj requirement in addon template
- From: Rui Batista <ruiandrebatista@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nvda-addons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:11:37 +0100
Hi Mesar,
> No dia 05/09/2014, às 09:31, Mesar Hameed <mesar.hameed@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> On Thu 04/09/14,01:01, Rui Batista wrote:
>>> On Fri 18/07/14,12:07, Mesar Hameed wrote:
> I have gone ahead and merged it into master.
>
Ok, thanks.
> Do you agree that branches t2694, t2694-2 and next should now be deleted?
> I hope I didn't overlook some functionality.
>
Yes, dn’t need them at all.
> Other than the better markdown branch which isn't quite
> completed/ready for merging, do you have any other improvements in mind for
> the template before we start roling it out?
>
For now nothing, but if people have any suggestions please tell me (I’m in
digest mode on the list due to changing jobs, but I’ll return when things get
more stable).
Regards,
Rui Batista
----------------------------------------------------------------
NVDA add-ons Central: A list for discussing NVDA add-ons
To post a message, send an email to nvda-addons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To unsubscribe, send an email with the subject line of "unsubscribe" (without
quotes) to nvda-addons-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
If you have questions for list moderators, please send a message to
nvda-addons-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Community addons can be found here: http://addons.nvda-project.org
Other related posts:
