[muglo] Re: OT - DNC list
- From: Theresa Roth <theresaroth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:52:00 -0500
OT=Off Topic
On Dec 3, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Doug Bale wrote:
On Wed, 12/3/08, doug rogers <dougsamu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> the message was addressed with OT. This is a convention
> we have agreed to use.
What's the convention, please, Doug? I haven't heard tell of it till
now. Does the OT signify "old topic" to indicate a dormant thread is
being revived?
---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at
<//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>
---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>
Other related posts:
