[modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: "Jem Harrison" <Jem.Harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:15:28 +0100
Thanks, Terry. You are spot-on!
Best wishes,
Jem
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Lane" <tel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:31 AM
Subject: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
>
> Yo Jem - 'pears to me you are between a rock and a hard place there - your
> equipment would be more suitable to 3 1/2" or 2 1/2" but a 5" is a better
> proposition, both from a first-time-builder's perspective and for
> operating
> ease.
>
>
>> Here is another 'new' topic, on which I would appreciate your opinions.
>> I am a relative newcomer to model engineering. I have no engineering
> background. In the distant past I have scratchbuilt models in 0 gauge
> (2-rail electric) and some wagons in Gauge 1. I have a Myford ML10 in
> reasonable condition and a small bench pillar drill (rough!). For the
> best
> part of the last three years I have been doing some restoration work on a
> Dore Westbury Mk.1: surgery on the motor, fitting new lead screws and
> nuts,
> devising different ways to attach the handles top the lead screws, making
> a
> drawbar, making a machine vice kit. It has been a long learning exercise!
> I now have some digital read-out bars that I have not succeeded yet in
> fitting....I do wonder if these are really worth the hassle.
>>
>> I want to get started on a locomotive. Until recently I reckoned that I
> would tackle something in 3½-inch gauge, but the vast majority of the
> received wisdom has advised against this size. So, what I would be
> interested to read on this discussion group is your views for and against
> 3½-inch and 5-inch gauge, oh and while we are about it, we could add
> 2½-inch
> gauge.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Jem Harrison
>> Basildon
>>
>>
>> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>>
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
>> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
> line.
>>
>
> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
> line.
>
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- References:
- [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Terry Lane
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Terry Lane