[modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: "Jem Harrison" <Jem.Harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:59:22 +0100
I accept your logic. However, engines are going to spend most of their time
on a shelf or on the floor!
7¼ is too big for me. It is a popular size at our club (three Roms, an
Edward Thomas, a Bantam Cock and a superb Holmside). I can see the
practicality of 5-inch and accept the weight of opinion for it.
Thanks,
Jem
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barrie Purslow" <bpduo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Model Engineering List" <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 7:56 PM
Subject: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
> Hi Jem,
>
> I think the first thing to do is decide what you intend to do with the
> engine. If you intend to keep it in a showcase then your choice of gauge
> is
> more or less determined by the space available for your showcase and the
> limitations of your equipment (including lifting equipment).
> If you intend to run the engine on a track then 5" is to be recommended as
> 31/2" is really too small to do serious work, more difficult to fire and
> not
> elligible for the GL5 ground level events. 71/4" is often too large for
> most
> peoples equipment and good tracks are few and far between.
> Pleased to hear this question being asked before committing to cutting
> metal - it never fails to amaze me how often people set off building a
> model
> without giving sufficient thought to issues such as this.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Barrie Purslow,
> WarringtonUK
>
> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
> line.
>
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Other related posts:
