[modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: "Jem Harrison" <Jem.Harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:16:32 +0100
Here is another 'new' topic, on which I would appreciate your opinions.
I am a relative newcomer to model engineering. I have no engineering
background. In the distant past I have scratchbuilt models in 0 gauge (2-rail
electric) and some wagons in Gauge 1. I have a Myford ML10 in reasonable
condition and a small bench pillar drill (rough!). For the best part of the
last three years I have been doing some restoration work on a Dore Westbury
Mk.1: surgery on the motor, fitting new lead screws and nuts, devising
different ways to attach the handles top the lead screws, making a drawbar,
making a machine vice kit. It has been a long learning exercise! I now have
some digital read-out bars that I have not succeeded yet in fitting....I do
wonder if these are really worth the hassle.
I want to get started on a locomotive. Until recently I reckoned that I would
tackle something in 3½-inch gauge, but the vast majority of the received wisdom
has advised against this size. So, what I would be interested to read on this
discussion group is your views for and against 3½-inch and 5-inch gauge, oh and
while we are about it, we could add 2½-inch gauge.
Best wishes,
Jem Harrison
Basildon
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: shep
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Terry Lane
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Charles & Dorothy Brumbelow
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: David Everett
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jeff Dayman
- [modeleng] RE: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Pendragon
- [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- From: Allen Messer
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Barrie Purslow
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: JOHN PAGETT
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Dave Beaman
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: shep
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Terry Lane
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Charles & Dorothy Brumbelow
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: David Everett
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jeff Dayman
- [modeleng] RE: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Pendragon
- [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- From: Allen Messer
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Barrie Purslow
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: JOHN PAGETT
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Dave Beaman