[modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: "alan Stepney" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:12:57 +0100
I am going to go against the trend and advice 3 1/2" IF, and only if, you
have a track or club, that accepts that size.
The ML10 is an excellent lathe, but it is small, and will limit what you can
build.
Unless you farm out some work, the lathe size should be the deciding factor.
In 5", I expect you could manage Ajax, but even Simplex might be beyond the
lathes capabilities.
(I would need to check on the drawings to be sure.)
I dont know about Sweet pea, as I havent seen the drawings. However, it isnt
one of my favourites.
3 1/2" is smaller, lighter to carry and easier to transport around.
They can haul a decent load, and many engines regularly haul a dozen or more
passengers round club tracks.
Look at the results for IMLEC and you will see what 3 1/2" engines can do
and how well they run.
The other advantage is that the cost of materials is less. Ruin a casting
and you only need speak nicely to the bank manager, not go down on bended
knee !!
At the end of the day, what you build should be what you can run, and, most
importantly, an engine that you like the look of.
Alan Stepney
http://www.alanstepney.info
Model Engineering & steam engine information pages
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- References:
- [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Dave Beaman
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] 3½ versus 5
- From: Dave Beaman