At 08:41 AM 12/29/04 -0000, you wrote: > . . . I don't wish to sound of sour grapes or bad cheese but do any of her models work, [snip] . . . I point out the work of Barrington Hares who's pieces actually run and run very well. - IP But that wasn't always the case, I recall hearing that dispite all the coverage it got in ME, he had a great deal of difficulty coaxing the Merlin** to run and mum was the word on it for a long while. But it did eventually run and was then retired to glass case duty. The same is the case with COMO**, which was run on air but IIRC was never run on steam and likewise was retired immediately to glass case duty, but this doesn't keep it from being revered as one of the finest loco models ever built. What sets it apart in my mind is the it was built with hand tools, breast drill, and treadle lathe. Of course anything built in 1885-1895 would have been built the same way. It is astounding to me that such a project could have ever been done, what with having no quick change carbide insert tooling, no 14x40 lathe, no Bridgeport, no CNC, no DRO, no EDM, etc. . . . all the things many of our so-called live steam gurus would have us believe we MUST have in order to make so much as a chip these days. Merlin = model of Rolls-Royce Merlin V16 aircraft engine (1/10th scale?) COMO = model of LBSCR 0-6-0 loco, approx 1" scale, built 1885-1898. Regards, Harry Wade Nashville Tennessee MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.