[modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- From: peter.chadwick@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:55:13 -0800
Charles said:
>Observation 1 -- If it is not electromagnetic and you disassemble it
without a proper "keeper" between the poles, the magnets will lose much of
their strength, just like the old two-pole motors for HO/OO trains.<
What is the mechanism that keeper provides? On the face of it, why should
an increase in reluctance lead to the domains re-arranging? It's one of
those things that I know happens, but don't understand why!
Peter Chadwick (out of the country again - no wonder I can never get in
the workshop!)
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks going OT - sorry guys!
- From: John Pagett
- [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- From: Charles & Dorothy Brumbelow
- References:
- [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- From: cbrumbelow
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] RE Magnetic Chucks.
- » [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- » [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- » [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- » [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks going OT - sorry guys!
- From: John Pagett
- [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- From: Charles & Dorothy Brumbelow
- [modeleng] Re: RE Magnetic Chucks.
- From: cbrumbelow