Wonder how accessible these will be. On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:57:57 -0400, you wrote: >I think the s750 will be around $1200 and the s950 is around $1900 but >don't quote me on it. > >They are apparently coming out now. One of the dealers on Synthzone >has received an s750 just this week. > >On 9/22/12, D!J!X! <megamansuperior@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> O nice! The 950? Any idea how much that'll be? I imagine the 1g price range >> that the upper mid range psr's have? >> Thanks for the info, looks like a few google moments are in store for when >> I >> get free time. >> >> THX, D!J!X! >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: moaccess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:moaccess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Vince Mistretta >> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 1:05 PM >> To: MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [MoAccess] Motif vs Tyros - A Practical Example >> >> DJX , >> Wait a few months. The new PSR S750 and S950 are just now coming out. >> >> For the Music Finder Viewer he used Quick Basic. He did some accessibility >> fixes on that product but I didn't work with him on the main screen where >> the lists of entries are. Have to Jaws cursor around on that one. Still >> needs a lot of work but it was helpful. I never tried any other software >> by >> him. Anyway, I don't have the need since I don't have a board which is >> addressed in his software. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "D!J!X!" <megamansuperior@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:28 AM >> To: <MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: [MoAccess] Motif vs Tyros - A Practical Example >> >>> Wow, Michael is still around! That's cool... Haven't spoken to him in >>> years. >>> Glad to hear he's still actively developing software for the >>> pssr/tyros line. When I get a s910 or whatever is out now I'll have to >> hunt him down. >>> Vince, has he been able to get accessibility into his tools? >>> Back in the day we were working with java and some other sdk's that >>> made it a task to get things working, not to mention jaws was behind >>> the times (the days of 4.1/4.2). >>> >>> D!J!X! >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: moaccess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:moaccess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>> On Behalf Of Vince Mistretta >>> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 6:46 AM >>> To: MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: [MoAccess] Motif vs Tyros - A Practical Example >>> >>> >>> All of that is only accessed through Sysex controls. If you remember, >>> back a few years ago on the T3 forum we had Michael Bedison who is one >>> of the biggest contributers on PSRTutorials come on and answer many >>> questions. I had asked him if he could modify his Music Finder View >>> application to take that information from a selected song entry and >>> send it to the T3. After a few months of testing it was done. He >>> said he had wanted to do it and was getting held up with some area but >>> found that those areas - tempo especially was changed via PCCC00,c32 >>> and PC controls. The styles, variations, intros and all that other >>> good stuff was only addressable through Sysex. >>> >>> The feature is still available in the program to this date. There is >>> no documentation on this in any of the manuals for either the Tyros >>> line or PSR line. I'm thinking he was able to capture this info >>> through his MIDI out. >>> All the messages are standard over both series; just the id for the >>> board and model is different. >>> >>> I sold my T3 off about two months ago. >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Steve Matzura" <number6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 11:13 PM >>> To: <MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: Re: [MoAccess] Motif vs Tyros - A Practical Example >>> >>>> My big complaint about the Tyros, and, I suspect, any arranger, is >>>> the lack of addressability via MIDI of certain features. I owned a T3 >>>> for about a year, and for the life of me, I could never figure out >>>> how to select styles or fills or breaks via MIDI. My goal in >>>> purchasing the thing was to do all that setup stuff with Sonar, >>>> record a song's backing track, then play over it with both hands. Ha, >>>> I remember as a kid I had this chord organ, and the first thing I >>>> learned to do with it was disable the chord functions so I could have >>>> a fuller keyboard and play my own chords! But what the Tyros offered >>>> in the way of arranger tools was so good, it drew me in, only to spit >>>> me out again when I found out I couldn't fire them via MIDI. If that >>>> capability exists there, I'd sure love to know how it's supposed to be >> done. >>>> >>>> On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 23:43:55 -0400, you wrote: >>>> >>>>>Bryan, >>>>> >>>>>What a great explanation. >>>>> >>>>>So I had always figured my Tyros was a good choice for the realistic >>>>>instruments. And when I wanted to compose a song with multiple >>>>>tracks, instruments, and effects, then I figured Sonar was my friend. >>>>> >>>>>However, I now appreciate the headwind in getting a DAW with Sonar >>>>>and all the supporting peripherals and wiring working. >>>>> >>>>>Just understanding tracks, channels, busses, banks, patches, sends, >>>>>all that termonology and the routing is enough to drive any newcomer >>>>>crazy. >>>>> >>>>>I can appreciate that it's all pre-packaged in the Motif. But still, >>>>>Motif doesn't talk, so perhaps the memorization necessary to master >>>>>Motif's workstation features is roughly equivalent to mastering >>>>>playing Tyros + Sonar + Cake Talking. >>>>> >>>>>Now if Motif talked, or we could link up Motif screens to an OCR >>>>>engine and have them spoken, that would be the ultimate, wouldn't it? >>>>> >>>>>Thanks again for your detailed explanation, >>>>> >>>>>Ben >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>At 08:31 PM 7/7/2012, you wrote: >>>>>>OK. This can get complicated, but here is the nut shell. >>>>>> >>>>>>An arranger keyboard solves a problem for a few types of musicians. >>>>>> >>>>>>If you gig by yourself, you have a virtual backup band that can play >>>>>>along with you. You select a musical style on the arranger, play the >>>>>>main keyboard part, and the band follows along. The instrument >>>>>>sounds on a good arranger keyboard are going to sound way better >>>>>>than some cheap general MIDI module or canned backing tracks. The >>>>>>keyboard also reacts to you, so if you stretch out with additional >>>>>>choruses, or if you want to throw in a break or solo, you can do that >>>>>> in >> the moment. >>>>>> >>>>>>The other big problem arrangers solve is they help someone that >>>>>>doesn't know how to play keyboard sound like a full band. I don't >>>>>>mean that the musician can't play keys, but playing keyboard is >>>>>>different from playing piano. Keyboard players learn how to spread >>>>>>out with wide two-handed chords to play more realistic guitar parts, >>>>>>how to play the correct intervals for instruments like harmonica, >>>>>>etc. If you play piano well, but don't know how to change your >>>>>>technique for those other instruments, then an arranger helps you. >>>>>>You basically play in the piano part, or else record in a few tracks >>>>>>that serve as guides, pick a style, and the arranger plays all of >>>>>>the other instruments for you. You can write this way, but you focus >>>>>>on the chords and melody, rather than playing each part. The styles >>>>>>are also useful for letting you hear how your chord progression and >>>>>>melody will sound when performed different ways. You focus on the >>>>>>big picture, and let the arranger worry about the details. >>>>>> >>>>>>A workstation keyboard is meant to be a self-contained instrument >>>>>>for composition/production of an entire song. It is supposed to be >>>>>>something like a scaled down studio or DAW. Motif has lots of >>>>>>ready-to-go instrument sounds, both a 16 track linear (tape recorder >>>>>>style), and a 16 track pattern (drum machine style) sequencer, a >>>>>>sampler that can be used to import loops, make new instruments, >>>>>>record vocals, etc, and, finally, Motif has a mixing/mastering >>>>>>system for getting the sound right. You might have a megabucks >>>>>>computer with a mountain of softsynths, but a workstation is a >>>>>>boiled down version of that for getting the tech out of your way so >>>>>>you can write. You turn on the Motif, and it is all there: no >>>>>>updates, drivers, viruses, etc. You perform your parts in to the >>>>>>sequencer on the Motif, mix it on the Motif, and can record your file >> directly to a USB flash drive. >>>>>>The idea is that you sit down, turn on the Motif, quickly play in >>>>>>your idea, quickly mix it, and get up with a recorded song. The >>>>>>computer has more synths, more and better effects, etc etc. If you >>>>>>want to demo a song idea, though, you can throw something together >>>>>>in a short time on the Motif that sounds good, rather than spend >>>>>>hours working through the infinite possibilities on the computer. If >>>>>>you end up loving your demo, you can jump on the computer with a >>>>>>better idea of where you're going. >>>>>> >>>>>>A workstation is also different from an arranger in that it lets you >>>>>>control just about everything. You can record and edit on all 16 >>>>>>tracks, instead of a few on an arranger. You have more performance >>>>>>controls that affect the tone of the instrument voice, where an >>>>>>arranger has mostly performance controls that affect the virtual >>>>>>band. You can also tweak the sound of any of your instruments: >>>>>>change the effects, edit the filters, envelopes, LFOs and other mod >>>>>>sources, all the way down to the individual samples, where an >>>>>>arranger doesn't go as deep with control of the instrument sounds. >>>>>> >>>>>>Arps or arpeggios get their name from history. On an instrument, you >>>>>>play an arpeggio by playing the notes of a chord individually in a >>>>>>pattern. In the ancient days, synthesizers had devices called >>>>>>arpeggiators that did this for you. You'd hold down a C major chord, >>>>>>and they'd play c, e, g, e, c, e, g, etc. You could change the >>>>>>pattern, so they'd play c, e, g, c, e, g, or g, e, c, g, e, c, but >>>>>>that was about it. On the Motif, an arpeggio is a bit like that in >>>>>>the sense that you can play a chord, but what comes out is a >>>>>>realistic sounding riff. For example, say you don't know how to play >>>>>>good guitar parts. You can pick a guitar sound for a track, select >>>>>>one of the guitar arpeggios, and just play the chords. The Motif >>>>>>will generate notes that sound like you're strumming, muting, >>>>>>tapping the guitar body for rhythm, etc. The arps on the Motif >>>>>>aren't as smart as the styles on the Tyros, but they try to help in >>>>>>the same way. You can also play them in to the sequencer one at a >>>>>>time, which gives you more control than you get on a Tyros. The >>>>>>Motif has a performance mode, where you can use up to 4 parts at >>>>>>once under arpeggiator control. People commonly make performances >>>>>>that include drums, bass, guitar, and keys. The result is something >>>>>>that sounds similar to a Tyros style, but with fewer parts. >>>>>> >>>>>>You can always hammer in a nail with a screw driver, but it isn't >>>>>>necessarily easy. That's why it's better to get the keyboard that is >>>>>>laid out to best handle the problems that you encounter the most in >>>>>>your work. >>>>>> >>>>>>Bryan >>>>>> >>>>>>On Jul 3, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Ben Humphreys wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks Bryan, I liked your summary: "The Tyros is a great arranger >>>>>>>with some workstation features. The Motif is a great workstation >>>>>>>with some arranger features." >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Unfortunately, I don't yet have a grasp for what "arranger" and >>>>>>>"workstation" mean specifically. However, an example might help >>>>>>>clarify the situation for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Let's say I have a 4-handed piano piece, such as "Heart and Soul." >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I want to make a first pass with the left handed part, a repeating >>>>>>>pattern. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Then a second pass with the right handed part. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I understand how I might do this with Sonar, recording the left >>>>>>>hands part on a track, and then looping it over and over. Then >>>>>>>putting the right hands part on its own track. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>How might I accomplish this with Motif and/or Tyros? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Is this where arpeggios on Motif come in? Is this where styles on >>>>>>>Tyros come in? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Without regard to using Sonar, how would this be accomplished on >>>>>>>a Motif vs. Tyros? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Obviously, I'm confused about a lot of terms: workstation, >>>>>>>arranger, arpeggios, styles and how they might apply to various >>>>>>>situations, and in particular the one I have described. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I'd be grateful to anyone who can set me straight :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Ben >>>>>>> >>>>>>>At 04:07 PM 7/1/2012, you wrote: >>>>>>>>There are a good many blind Tyros users out there. Most of these >>>>>>>>people are using the Tyros for doing one-man shows: weddings, >>>>>>>>small parties, etc. It is incredibly realistic at being a backing >>>>>>>>band while you play. The styles, harmonizer, and so forth aren't >>>>>>>>really useful if you're playing with a full band. Ensemble >>>>>>>>keyboard players would do better with a workstation, where they >>>>>>>>can split/layer voices as much as they want, as well as build >>>>>>>>their own from scratch. I know a few blind people that have the >>>>>>>>Tyros as a studio sound module, but is very expensive for that >> approach. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The Tyros is a great arranger with some workstation features. The >>>>>>>>Motif is a great workstation with some arranger features. My >>>>>>>>personal opinion is that the Tyros is the superior live keyboard, >>>>>>>>and the Motif is the superior studio piece, but they both can do >>>>>>>>either things to some degree. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Anyway, there isn't a blind Tyros users list, as far as I know, >>>>>>>>but lots of them are on MIDI-Mag. At one point, there were panel >>>>>>>>descriptions, menu descriptions, and so on floating around for at >>>>>>>>least the Tyros 3. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I suggest to ask on MIDI-Mag. Go to >>>>>>>><<http://www.midimag.org>http://www.midimag.org>www.midimag.org. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Bryan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Jun 29, 2012, at 4:51 PM, D!J!X! wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>The motif is different in the layout and navigation than the >>>>>>>>>tyros and the top line psr. The tyros and psr are aranger >>>>>>>>>keyboards, with the styles and are geared more toward quick >>>>>>>>>composition and perfomance like that. You can use it with a >>>>>>>>>sequencer with no problem, and for quick recordings. Not sure >>>>>>>>>what it has in terms of sampling capabilities, but the motif is >>>>>>>>>more of a workstation, you can make more customized full songs on >>>>>>>>>there, they have pattern mode for quick loop based music >>>>>>>>>creation, and it's more of an overall perfoming workstation, with >>>>>>>>>separate channels and assignable parts and such for performing, >>>>>>>>>the tyros and psr just have the main voice, 1 or 2 layers that >>>>>>>>>you can add, and a left hand split along with the styles. >>>>>>>>>The motif for example can have 4 separate keyboard zones or 4 >>>>>>>>>layers (probably more in the xf and xs), you can use arps with >>>>>>>>>the voices (short musical loops), and you can even use the >>>>>>>>>pattern mode to create a 16 track part or such to use in >>>>>>>>>performances. It also has many more effects than the tyros and >>>>>>>>>more advanced routing, as it's meant for the studio musician and >>>>>>>>>the live gigging musician as well. >>>>>>>>>But if you're using the tyros in studio or for small >>>>>>>>>performances, the tyros should be fine, though because of it's >>>>>>>>>different layout and such it'll be harder to get help, since most >>>>>>>>>people on this list at least use the motif line. The good thing >>>>>>>>>about the tyros and psr navigation system is that it stays >>>>>>>>>constant and once you learn it you can get around most of those >> keyboards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>HTH, D!J!X! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>From: >>>>>>>>><<mailto:moaccess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:moaccess-bounce@fre >>>>>>>>>e >>>>>>>>>lists.org><mailto:moaccess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>moaccess-bounce@f >>>>>>>>>r >>>>>>>>>eelists.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>[mailto:moaccess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>>>>>>>>On Behalf Of Ben Humphreys >>>>>>>>>Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:52 PM >>>>>>>>>To: >>>>>>>>><<mailto:MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><ma >>>>>>>>>i lto:MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>MoAccess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>>>Subject: [MoAccess] Motif vs Tyros >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Hi folks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I have a question relating to accessability of the Motif vs the >>>>>>>>>Tyros. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I've heard it consistently stated that Motif is one of the best >>>>>>>>>workstations for a blind musician, presumably because so many >>>>>>>>>functions are accessible from dedicated buttons and the screen >>>>>>>>>interface is button-based, not touch-based. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>However, when I went to purchase a Motif, I was so enamored with >>>>>>>>>the even more beautiful sounds of the Tyros that I ended up >>>>>>>>>getting a Tyros 4 instead. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I figured the Yamaha Tyros interface was similar enough to Motif >>>>>>>>>that I wouldn't be at any disadvantage to a Motif user. Tyros >>>>>>>>>has lots of buttons I can label in Braille, and screen has 10 >>>>>>>>>buttons, A through J, tab keys, and 1 through 8 up / down >>>>>>>>>buttons. I'm assuming Motif is very similar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Of course, there is no ty-access mailing list, and certain apps, >>>>>>>>>such as those from John Melas, won't work with Tyros. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>But I'm using Sonar with Cake Talking, same as I would with Motif. >>>>>>>>>And I've found a Tyros 4 Instrument Definition File so presumably >>>>>>>>>can select instruments easily using Sonar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Which leads to my question: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Is the Motif preferred among the blind community over the Tyros >>>>>>>>>primarily because the Motif is somehow more accessable? Or is it >>>>>>>>>perhaps that the Tyros is a bit on the expensive side? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Is there some compelling reason I'd want to sell my Tyros and get >>>>>>>>>a Motif instead? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Thanks for your help, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Ben >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>>>You received this message because you're subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>MoAccess e-mail list. >>>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for >>>>>>>>>the MoAccess list, please use the FreeLists page. >>>>>>>>><<//www.freelists.org/list/moaccess>//www.freelists.org >>>>>>>>>/ list/moaccess>//www.freelists.org/list/moaccess >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>>>You received this message because you're subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>MoAccess e-mail list. >>>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for >>>>>>>>>the MoAccess list, please use the FreeLists page. >>>>>>>>><//www.freelists.org/list/moaccess>//www.freelists.org/ >>>>>>>>>l >>>>>>>>>ist/moaccess >>>>>>> >>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>You received this message because you're subscribed to the MoAccess >>>>>>>e-mail list. >>>>>>>To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for the >>>>>>>MoAccess list, please use the FreeLists page. >>>>>>><//www.freelists.org/list/moaccess>//www.freelists.org/li >>>>>>>s >>>>>>>t/moaccess >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you're subscribed to the MoAccess >>>> e-mail list. >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for the >>>> MoAccess list, please use the FreeLists page. >>>> //www.freelists.org/list/moaccess >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you're subscribed to the MoAccess >>> e-mail list. >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for the >>> MoAccess list, please use the FreeLists page. >>> //www.freelists.org/list/moaccess >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you're subscribed to the MoAccess >>> e-mail list. >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for the >>> MoAccess list, please use the FreeLists page. >>> //www.freelists.org/list/moaccess >> >> -- >> You received this message because you're subscribed to the MoAccess e-mail >> list. >> To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for the MoAccess >> list, please use the FreeLists page. >> //www.freelists.org/list/moaccess >> >> -- >> You received this message because you're subscribed to the MoAccess e-mail >> list. >> To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for the MoAccess >> list, please use the FreeLists page. >> //www.freelists.org/list/moaccess >> > > >-- >Vince Mistretta >Call me at 561-234-7631 >Skype Name: vin5451 -- You received this message because you're subscribed to the MoAccess e-mail list. To unsubscribe, change your list options, or view archives for the MoAccess list, please use the FreeLists page. //www.freelists.org/list/moaccess