[mira_talk] Re: denovo results clarifications
- From: Stefano Ghignone <stefano.ghignone@xxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:53:56 +0200
On 03/28/2010 05:30 PM, Bastien Chevreux wrote:
This is ... interesting. For whatever reason, MIRA thinks it is a good idea to
cut back these reads. Why it thinks that I have no idea and needs to be
investigated.
I just gave another try...I mapped again reads vs the backbones, this
time including the previously assembled and missing contig.
Now mira pulls out other 2356 reads, but they do not cover the contig
for the whole length, and the sanger reads are still not used....
Is this version of mira too stringent?
--
Dr. Stefano Ghignone
Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, Sez. Torino - CNR
c/o Dpt. Plant Biology, University of Turin
V.le P.A. Mattioli, 25
I-10125 Turin
Italy
Phone: +39 011 6502927 ext. 48
Fax: +39 011 6705962
e-mail: stefano.ghignone@xxxxxxxx
MSN: ste.ghi@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.bioveg.unito.it
http://www.sppadbase.com
http://www.dinamycode.it/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
Other related posts:
