[mira_talk] Re: denovo results clarifications

  • From: Stefano Ghignone <stefano.ghignone@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:34:20 +0100

Bastien,

On 03/22/2010 11:06 PM, Bastien Chevreux wrote:
This needs some lofile reading at the moment, I'm sorry.
thanks a lot for your really exhaustive explanations.
I had a look expecially at the *skimmarknastyrepeats* file where I found really bad things....

But I also verified that some contigs I previously got with v.2.9* are no more present in the assembly: the bad news is that I PCR validated and re-sequenced some of them and now I get that these sequences are listed as debris.....

This sound weird...

s.

--
Dr. Stefano Ghignone
Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, Sez. Torino - CNR
c/o Dpt. Plant Biology, University of Turin
V.le P.A. Mattioli, 25
I-10125 Turin
Italy
Phone:    +39 011 6502927 ext. 48
Fax:      +39 011 6705962
e-mail:   stefano.ghignone@xxxxxxxx
MSN:      ste.ghi@xxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.bioveg.unito.it
http://www.sppadbase.com

http://www.dinamycode.it/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing 
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit 
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html

Other related posts: