On 03/24/2010 05:34 PM, Stefano Ghignone wrote:
But I also verified that some contigs I previously got with v.2.9* are no more present in the assembly: the bad news is that I PCR validated and re-sequenced some of them and now I get that these sequences are listed as debris.....
I'm trying to find out the reason of what I reported a couple of days ago...Checking into the file *project*_int_clippings.0.txt, some of the already validated and re-sequenced 454 reads show these situation:
load: changed qual. EQM15JM01A2C7J Left: 15 Right: 230 load: unchanged mask. EQM15JM01A2C7J Left: 0 Right: 246 proposed cutback 1a: left EQM15JM01A2C7J 15 -> 24 proposed cutback 1a: right EQM15JM01A2C7J 230 -> 196 skim detect: possible junk: EQM15JM01A2C7J [172,0 proposed cutback: left EQM15JM01A2C7J 196 -> 245 load: changed qual. EQM15JM01EZ3TG Left: 15 Right: 228 load: unchanged mask. EQM15JM01EZ3TG Left: 0 Right: 244 skim detect: possible junk: EQM15JM01EZ3TG [213,0 proposed cutback: left EQM15JM01EZ3TG 228 -> 243 load: changed qual. EQM15JM01C0Z6V Left: 15 Right: 170 load: unchanged mask. EQM15JM01C0Z6V Left: 0 Right: 199 proposed cutback 1a: left EQM15JM01C0Z6V 15 -> 34 skim detect: possible junk: EQM15JM01C0Z6V [93,0 proposed cutback: left EQM15JM01C0Z6V 127 -> 198 load: changed qual. EQM15JM01E6YH1 Left: 15 Right: 234 load: unchanged mask. EQM15JM01E6YH1 Left: 0 Right: 250 proposed cutback 1a: right EQM15JM01E6YH1 234 -> 207 skim detect: possible junk: EQM15JM01E6YH1 [192,0 proposed cutback: left EQM15JM01E6YH1 207 -> 249 load: changed qual. EQM15JM01CPVJ8 Left: 15 Right: 237 load: unchanged mask. EQM15JM01CPVJ8 Left: 0 Right: 253 proposed cutback 1a: right EQM15JM01CPVJ8 237 -> 235 skim detect: possible junk: EQM15JM01CPVJ8 [0,174 proposed cutback: left EQM15JM01CPVJ8 15 -> 17 proposed cutback: right EQM15JM01CPVJ8 61 -> 48 proposed cutback: EQM15JM01CPVJ8 killed, remaining length (31) skim detect: possible junk: EQM15JM01CPVJ8 [31,0
How should I interpret these values and which are the settings I need to tune to let such reads be included into the assembly?
I also included the sanger sequences which should cover the same dna region, but they where excluded as well:
load: changed qual. 8-283f.ab1 Left: 15 Right: 865 load: unchanged mask. 8-283f.ab1 Left: 0 Right: 881 load: changed qual. 8-283r.ab1 Left: 15 Right: 930 load: unchanged mask. 8-283r.ab1 Left: 0 Right: 1008 load: changed minleft. 8-283f.ab1 Left: 15 -> 30 load: changed minleft. 8-283r.ab1 Left: 15 -> 30 proposed cutback 1a: left 8-283f.ab1 30 -> 33 skim detect: possible junk: 8-283f.ab1 [832,0 skim detect: possible junk: 8-283r.ab1 [900,0 proposed cutback: left 8-283f.ab1 865 -> 880 proposed cutback: left 8-283r.ab1 930 -> 1007
...it has been experimentally validated!!... :-( Regards, stefano -- Dr. Stefano Ghignone Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, Sez. Torino - CNR c/o Dpt. Plant Biology, University of Turin V.le P.A. Mattioli, 25 I-10125 Turin Italy Phone: +39 011 6502927 ext. 48 Fax: +39 011 6705962 e-mail: stefano.ghignone@xxxxxxxx MSN: ste.ghi@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bioveg.unito.it http://www.sppadbase.com http://www.dinamycode.it/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html