On 23 October 2014 20:13, Stefano <phd.st.p@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23 October 2014 19:37, Daurnimator <quae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Now that the lua 5.3 beta is out, this is worth revisiting. >> Will LuaJIT keep up with 5.3? >> >> What I would want support for (that can't be bolted on with >> shims/libraries): >> >> - Moving 64bit ints to not be cdata, but of "number" type >> - the new bit operators (<<, >>, etc) >> - lexical _ENV >> - C API! > > I'm not sure the first one is a good idea. > I personally prefer the approach taken by LuaJIT (different type), > it's simpler and clearer. Most likely it's also easier to optimise for > LuaJIT. > > Stefano I'd find the bit operators and _ENV convenient, and I don't care about the C API (but I understand it's due to my use case). Stefano