I appreciate what you've said. I'd be glad to know what your response to the BBC article I posted is. Julie Krueger ========Original Message======== Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone? Date: 10/12/2006 1:27:11 P.M. Central Standard Time From: _pas@xxxxxxxxx (mailto:pas@xxxxxxxx) To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on: >John Mc: Statistics, hell. It looks like George can't even do arithmetic. The trouble is, the arithmetic doesn't support the 'statistics' from the study that Julie cited. It concluded that 654,000 - or 2.5% of the population had been killed. For Julie, Just a beginning of my analysis, which will probably be met with "oh come on Paul, don't spin for Bush" admonitions from all the alarmists: Well let's just take the 100 people a day in the streets of Baghdad "statistic". Over 3 years, if 100 citizens of Baghdad were killed --There are approximately 5.7 million citizens living there -- therefore, this only represents about 0.19% of the population of Baghdad. So... for approximately 25% of the population of Iraq, living in what is arguably one of the most violent zones of the country, the death rate is .19%. I would like to know, where are all these other of the '47 randomly selected' sections where they conducted the interviews. p ########## Paul Stone pas@xxxxxxxx Kingsville, ON, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html