I make the Baghdad calculation 1.9 per cent.
100 x 365 = 36,500
36,500 x 3 = 109,500
109500 / 5,700,000 = 0.0192
0.0192 x 100 = 1.92
Certainly closer to the study's 2.5 per cent.
And as the population of Baghdad reduces, then the daily rate represents a growing percentage.
Simon
John Mc: Statistics, hell. It looks like George can't even do arithmetic.
The trouble is, the arithmetic doesn't support the 'statistics' from the study that Julie cited. It concluded that 654,000 - or 2.5% of the population had been killed.
For Julie, Just a beginning of my analysis, which will probably be met with "oh come on Paul, don't spin for Bush" admonitions from all the alarmists:
Well let's just take the 100 people a day in the streets of Baghdad "statistic". Over 3 years, if 100 citizens of Baghdad were killed --There are approximately 5.7 million citizens living there -- therefore, this only represents about 0.19% of the population of Baghdad. So... for approximately 25% of the population of Iraq, living in what is arguably one of the most violent zones of the country, the death rate is .19%. I would like to know, where are all these other of the '47 randomly selected' sections where they conducted the interviews.
p
########## Paul Stone pas@xxxxxxxx Kingsville, ON, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html