[lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- From: John Wager <john.wager1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:26:34 -0500
Simon Ward wrote:
Though not a statistician (just a sub-standard economist), I looked
over the Lancet article and on the assumption that all their
calculations are accurate (I'm sure they checked it), the only problem
I could see in their methodology was in the procedural rules
established to protect their interviewers. However, I doubt this would
have impacted upon the results.
I've mentioned this before, I think, but it's now relevant again. The
NPR radio show This American Life did an interview with the
author of the study when it first came out, and he does a pretty good
job of explaining the methodology used in that study.
Here's a direct link:
http://207.70.82.73/pages/descriptions/05/300.html
For "This American Life" (from whence you can do a search for "Iraq") go
to http://www.thislife.org/
--
-------------------------------------------------
"Never attribute to malice that which can be
explained by incompetence and ignorance."
-------------------------------------------------
John Wager john.wager1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Lisle, IL, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: statisticions, anyone?