You wrote: > A moderate who is able to speak the language of faith will do 'okay'. This could be a description of Iran: [American] Ayatollahs approving and allowing only those who support the faith. Presumably 'okay' is in quotes because if they were immoderately religious, they'd have it made. Andy Amago > [Original Message] > From: <Eternitytime1@xxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 5/7/2005 9:30:09 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Who in 2008? > > Hi, Stan, > Thanks for the reasoned thoughtfulness! > > I like John Edwards, too, and he was doing great here in Missouri (until the > debate...strange how I think just the act of sitting made it more difficult > for him to respond to Cheney...and he said nothing new in response and seemed > to 'canned'. That was odd compared to what I had heard from him in the > past.) > > I think John Kerry would have a decent chance if he was somehow able to > address the issue of the Swift Boat Vets in a different way. (I would have > handled it much more agressively--I looked up some of what John Kerry did in > regards to keeping the MIA/POW in the forefront of Congress in those early years, > etc. Would have paid to reprint the Chicago Tribune editorial in every > single major and not-so-major paper and had it read aloud, even, on radio...but > that is me <g> and I knew that those ads from that group was what tipped people > on the fence over...for patriotism, honor and respect is so so important. > But, he had all those attributes--but they were not showcased. Like it or > not, we live in a world which has to have such showcased ... though maybe as > people crash and burn (or are helpless to help those they love), we will as a > People, begin to look at substance again. Maybe it's a dream, though...<wry > look> > > I think the Republicans are going to have a huge fight eventually--for while > most of the moderates all act like they have had their arms twisted behind > them so they are rolling over even on legislation(s) that they proposed and > advocated for (I think of Missouri's own Sen Bond...), they are not willing to > completely change parties. (yet) > > The pro-life issue IS an important one, but not as important as some of the > others. I still want to put up billboards that say "Life begins with the > heartbeat." (thus, embryonic stem cell research is 'okay', most abortions are > 'okay', etc.) Just because it would be using the tactics that were done in the > what? late 70s-early 80s? There are alot of people in Missouri who are > seeing that ultra-conservative point of view go a bit too far with the > legislation dealing with stem cell research, etc. that was introduced. The economic > impact on our state would be horrific--there are a number of bio-tech and > research firms which were going to halt their next phases of > development/investment...and all of a sudden they got cranky. (It helped that Jack Danforth came > back to town, so to speak, as he is extremely moderate and very well > respected...and holds alot of clout in terms of $$ and connections...) > > A moderate who is able to speak the language of faith will do 'okay'. I > don't know how John Edwards would do, now. I think alot of people like John > Kerry better now, too <g> Well, the alternative which we have now is not very > productive in terms of making their everyday life better, so maybe that is not > saying much <g>. > > Anyway, better get on with my day. > > Thanks for your thoughts (they helped diffuse my emotions!) > Marlena in Missouri > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html