Hi, Yes, it is true. SB539 has passed the Missouri House and will be signed by Blunt. (son of prominent Roy Blunt, a US Representative--who was once a Missouri governor, as well. He adores Bush, I think, because he sees himself as part of a MO dynasty... He is also a Naval Academy graduate (he is pretty young, it is true) and all of his advertisements only stated that he was the son of a schoolteacher [his mom]...and so, for a while, people were unsure during his campaign if he was his father's son. Most of the $ for his campaign came from those wanting his father's influence, though.) Anyway, the bill, with the current budget bills, cuts health care/Medicaid for more than 100,000 Missourians including: Adults in poverty - limited to the old 1996 AFDC assistance level - or between 18-23% of the federal poverty level (incomes les than about $300 a month for a family of three), impacting more than 70,000 parents; Limits assistance for the elderly and permanently disabled to 74% of the poverty level, impacting 30,000 Missourians; Eliminates General Relief Medicaid Assistance, impacting 3,000 Missourians with disabilities; Eliminates the MAWD - Medical Assistance for Workers with Disabilities, impacting 17,000 Missourians; Institutes premiums for CHIP/MC+ kids for those with incomes above 150% of the federal poverty level, impacting 23,000 kids; Institutes co-payments for every service; Diminishes services provided to people who still qualify for Medicaid (with the proposition that Medicaid be completely eliminated in three years) The bill is devastating. It also creates a Medicaid Commission that will begin meeting this summer and is charged with developing a plan to replace Medicaid beginning in 2006. That, however, is not mandated so who knows if what happens and is suggested will actually happen. The bill passed on a close to party lien vote. Most republicans voted for the bill and were under intense pressure from the Governor and Representative Jetton to do so. Only 6 republicans voted against the bill, all the democrats voted against the bill and 2 republicans abstained. The republicans who voted against the bill include: Bean, Black, Kraus, Schneider, Parker and Nance Those abstaining: Marsh and Stevenson. These folks chose to go against their party pressure to take a position that Health Care should not be a Partisan Issue. I do not know how that will be viewed by those in their party, though. The info in the LA Times article that Judy posted is definitely what is 'out there' and happening: "The result: Medicaid now covers 53 million Americans. The program pays the bills for nearly 60% of all nursing home residents and finances 37% of all births. Because most states have added prescription drug benefits, Medicaid covers the hefty pharmacy bills for many patients with AIDS, many transplant recipients and many senior citizens on dialysis or undergoing chemotherapy." There will be people dying. Nursing homes WILL kick people out, too. What will happen to them? Where will they go? I thought the question of what a leader really is was relevant to discussion on Lit-Ideas. What is the function of a community leader? What is the function of our state reps and senators--much less our government? This was stated in the LA Times article: **State Rep. Trent Skaggs, a Democrat from Kansas City, considers the new rules cruel, especially at a time when more than 45 million Americans lack insurance. He worries parents will stop working so their income will drop low enough to qualify their family for free care. Rather than raise costs for minimum-wage clerks, Skaggs suggests increasing insurance premiums for lawmakers who get health coverage through the state. He recently introduced a measure that would have cost the average politician $115 a month â?? the measure failed on a close vote. "That made a complete mockery of the idea that leaders sacrifice first," Skaggs said. "Times are tough, but not so tough that we have to sacrifice?"** It is reflective on not just what is happening in our state government--but also in so much of what we are doing. I don't know if it is primarily these younger men/women who are now in positions of power who have no real grasp of what leadership has been (traditionally) or if it is the 'business culture' (not the 'healthy business' culture but the stereotypical one) or what is happening. I see this happening so much in our society--and it has had the effect of not creating loyalty amongst individuals within alot of organizations/groups/businesses/service organizations, even. It is very much no longer that we are going to help each other--one for all and all for one. There is, still, some bewilderment in that regard--but if there is anything trickling down...it is that sense that no one cares. It's like one is either the victim or the victimizer--and thus identifying with either/or and becoming like either one--and no one ever realizes (any more) that there IS a third alternative... I'm pretty sad today about this. It's pretty awful. One in five Missourians are going to be critically affected--and the rest of us, I imagine, will have to make decisions as to what to do about our neighbors (me/Julie), customers (Julie's husband), co-workers, etc. Some of us will harden our hearts and become like the vicimizers and others will sacrifice (that word, again) ourselves and our families in order to help our neighbors and friends and those we meet who are in need. We need, again, to see the third way... Thinking of the similarities of the new Star Wars movie <g> and how popular culture so often shines a mirror on reality--but not knowing of the solution in spite of that, Marlena in Missouri ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html