[lit-ideas] What's happening in Japan
- From: Eternitytime1@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 13:40:32 EDT
HI,
SO, what is happening in Japan?
I thought it was interesting that it was stated that instead of using
religious languagine, they were using lanuage oriented to nationalism.
Do you think it is more about the whole 'low-birth rate' issue, no one
really wanting to take care of the elderly, or what?
Has there really been a breakdown of society and family in Japan?
Thinking about the future,
Marlena in Missouri
INTERNATIONAL
In Japan, Women's Constitutional Rights in Peril
By Catherine Makino - WeNews correspondent
TOKYO (WOMENSENEWS)--The clock will be rolled way back for Japanese women,
if the ruling Liberal Democratic Party succeeds in its efforts to change the
constitution, women's advocates here say.
Some are calling it a return to "a dark period of history." Many are also
outraged that such a drastic change in the constitution began under what seems
to be a veil of secrecy.
The constitution, written in 1946 after World War II, helped reshape life
for women here. One of its major changes was to ensure that marriage would be
solely based on agreement of husband and wife, who had equal rights. Before
then women were not guaranteed civil rights or legal rights. They were not
allowed to vote or own property. Although husbands could file for divorce,
wives
could not.
Then, in June of last year, a constitutional revision panel of the ruling
party proposed adding language to Article 24 of the constitution that would
emphasize the values of family and community.
Discussions about overall revisions to the entire constitution are currently
taking place, with the main focus and major arguments centered on the
war-renouncing Article 9. That article prohibits the government from taking
part in
and even preparing for any military actions.
The report on Article 24 expressed concern that "individualism" had been
distorted into "egoism" in postwar Japan, leading to the collapse of family
and
community values.
"It is shameful that Japanese people no longer think much of family,
community and the nation, and that some of them even insist on having a system
of
retaining separate family names," Masahiro Morioka, a ruling party member in
the House of Representatives said in the report. "The constitution must ensure
that protecting family is the foundation of securing the nation."
Hisako Motoyama, a leading Osaka activist against the revision, says: "The
government is borrowing family values--which attack women--from the U.S. It's
the same thing, but the only difference is that we don't use religious
language, we use nationalistic language.
"This is an attack on women's constitutional rights. They want to change the
fundamental principles of the constitution."
Fear of Setbacks
Women's rights groups say the revisions, by asserting citizens' family
responsibilities, could undo advances that have propelled women into senior
positions in government and business and to attain equal-pay standards in many
fields.
"There is a backlash against feminism, and the ruling party is campaigning
against gender and sex education," Motoyama said. "They are saying feminism is
breaking down our social foundation. They are against gender equality."
Mamiko Ueno, an author and professor of constitutional law at Chuo
University in Tokyo, sees the revision as an attempt to foist state
responsibilities
onto the family, which--by and large--means women.
"Because there is a problem with low birth rate in Japan, the LDP [Liberal
Democratic Party] thinks that by creating a system where women stay at home,
they will have more children," she said. "They will become second-class
citizens and men will head households. If a man doesn't want his wife to work,
she
will be forced to stay at home and take care of the family. It also means the
care for the elderly in Japan's aging society, which is sure to become
increasingly difficult, will fall to the daughter or daughter-in-law."
But Hajime Funada, the ruling party's chair on constitutional revisions,
says Article 24 will not affect gender equality.
"We will follow the 'slogan of men and women's equality,'" he said recently.
"We only want to add that the people of this nation should follow and keep
their obligation and responsibility to protect and conserve their own family.
They should also respect their parents. It will create a bond that will tie
together the local community."
Seiko Nodo, a female ruling party member, also believes "it's not a bad
thing," said her secretary.
National Referendum Looms
Lawmakers in both houses of Japan's National Diet are expected to vote in
favor of the revisions. If it passes by a two-thirds majority in both houses
then many here consider it will likely face a national referendum.
Pema Gyalpo, a professor of the law faculty at Toin University of Yokohama
and advisor to the ruling party on the constitution, predicts the vote could
happen within a year. "The ruling party feels the public is ready for it," he
said.
Opposition to Article 24 is mounting. Last year 15 women's groups, with the
support of 80 other groups, opened a nationwide "Stop the Revision of Article
24" campaign of spreading leaflets and holding public meetings to get the
news out.
Campaign organizers fear that many voters will find the revision appealing
because of its references to such things as the "importance of the family" and
"authentic traditional and culture of the nation."
"I am extremely concerned about this point," Motoyama says. "It is vital
that people have the chance to think about the real meaning of these proposed
amendments and have a real debate based on accurate information, but the
mainstream media are not reporting anything at all regarding Article 24."
Conservative Paper Supports Revision
The conservative Yomiuri Shimbun, one of the few major newspapers to cover
the proposed revision of Article 24, has published an editorial in support of
the revision, saying "family should be protected as the foundation of
society."
Consensus about revising the constitution has been building for years, but
some say it now has the air of inevitability.
Sixty-one percent of respondents to a nationwide Yomiuri Shimbun survey
support revision of the constitution. The figure marks the second consecutive
year that support for constitutional revision has exceeded 60 percent, with 65
percent reported last year.
In addition to the constitutional push, the government is also making other
moves to restrict women's rights.
About two years ago, for instance, the government--citing what it called a
troubling rise in the number of divorces--instituted restrictions on the
eligibility of single mothers for child-care benefits. A single woman with one
child would have to earn less than $12,000 a year, to receive a maximum
monthly
benefit of around $400. Previously, a single mother earning less than $23,500
was eligible for full benefits.
"We women in Japan are worried by the recent moves of the governing party
that shows a social trend toward reducing women's rights, and we want to stop
it," Mami Nakano, a lawyer, said recently.
Catherine Makino is a freelance writer in Tokyo. She has written for San
Francisco Chronicle, the Japan Times, The Asian Wall Street Journal and the
China Morning Post.
For more information:
Do Not Drop Gender Equality From Constitution! - (In Japanese): -
http://www.jca.apc.org/ajwrc/programs/campaign/details/2004/savearticle24.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
