> There's clearly a great deal about Finland that I > don't begin to > understand... > > _http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=573&e=9&u=/nm/odd_finland_int > ernet_dc_ > (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=573&e=9&u=/nm/odd_finland_internet_dc) > I'll explain. My copatriots tend to be moderate practical people, but when it comes to defence the feelings are almost religious. We have a wartime readiness of about 1 million troops. Should you ask what exactly we need such a force for, and you get abstract nonsense about military vacuum or something like that. Ask the same question from a high ranking officer, and you'll get the same answer in different words ("necessity of a credible independent defence", etc.) After a few beers, he'll tell you in a quiet voice that having to train tens of thousands of kids is a total waste of resources, resource that could better used to properly arm and train a much smaller semi-professional force. Which is what we would be reasonable given the current threats and missions, such as Peace Keeping or even participation in offencive operations, for which we are not going to use concripts for anyway. Saying that out loud would cause a public outcry, heck, we even freaked out when a Swedish general said something to that effect about their armed forces, including incredibly stupid remarks from normally pacifist President Halonen about Swedes outsourcing their defence to us. So, Finnish military command is quietly doing what they can to cut down the number of men they call for duty. Including inventing fancy new pathologies such as Web Addiction. Cheers, Teemu Helsinki, Finland _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html