Actually, my intent is... If we choose to allow the restriction of others' freedoms based upon accordance with our own beliefs, or societal norms Then, we must be willing to submit the allowance/restriction our own freedoms to the beliefs of others, or societal norms clear as chocolate mousse, d. P.S. It would certainly have been a bad argument... Robert Paul wrote: If I understand you at all—and it's very possible I don't—you seem to be saying that if some people are 'restricted' in some way, some of the time, it follows that all of the people may be 'restricted' in any way at any time. This strikes me as simply a bad argument, but as I say, I may have misunderstood you. Robert Paul -- See Exclusive Video: 10th Annual Young Hollywood Awards http://www.hollywoodlife.net/younghollywoodawards2008/