[lit-ideas] Re: The Bush Button

  • From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 08:27:01 -0800

Here, Eric, another traitor for your list. -- andreas

IMPEACH BUSH
By Garrison Keillor
Salon
March 1, 2006

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/03/01/keillor/

These are troubling times for all of us who love this country, as surely we
all do, even the satirists. You may poke fun at your mother, but if she is
belittled by others it burns your bacon. A blowhard French journalist writes
a book about America that is full of arrogant stupidity, and you want to let
the air out of him and mail him home flat. You hear young people talk about
America as if it's all over, and you trust that this is only them talking
tough. And then you read the paper and realize the country is led by a man
who isn't paying attention, and you hope that somebody will poke him. Or put
a sign on his desk that says, "Try Much Harder."

Do we need to impeach him to bring some focus to this man's life? The man
was lost and then he was found and now he's more lost than ever, plus being
blind.

The Feb. 27 issue of the New Yorker carries an article by Jane Mayer about a
loyal conservative Republican and U.S. Navy lawyer, Albert Mora, and his
resistance to the torture of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay. From within the
Pentagon bureaucracy, he did battle against Donald Rumsfeld and John Yoo at
the Justice Department and shadowy figures taking orders from Dick (Gunner)
Cheney, arguing America had ratified the Geneva Convention that forbids
cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of prisoners, and so it has the
force of law. They seemed to be arguing that the president has the right to
order prisoners to be tortured.

One such prisoner, Mohammed al-Qahtani, was held naked in isolation under
bright lights for months, threatened by dogs, subjected to unbearable noise
volumes, and otherwise abused, so that he begged to be allowed to kill
himself. When the Senate approved the Torture Convention in 1994, it defined
torture as an act "specifically intended to inflict severe physical or
mental pain or suffering." Is the law a law or is it a piece of toast?

Wiretap surveillance of Americans without a warrant? Great. Go for it. How
about turning over American ports to a country more closely tied to 9/11
than Saddam Hussein was? Fine by me. No problem. And what about the war in
Iraq? Hey, you're doing a heck of a job, Brownie. No need to tweak a thing.
And your blue button-down shirt -- it's you.

But torture is something else. When Americans start pulling people's
fingernails out with pliers and poking lighted cigarettes into their palms,
then we need to come back to basic values. Most people agree with this, and
in a democracy that puts the torturers in a delicate position. They must
make sure to destroy their e-mails and have subordinates who will take the
fall. Because it is impossible to keep torture secret. It goes against the
American grain and it eats at the conscience of even the most disciplined,
and in the end the truth will come out. It is coming out now.

According to the leaders of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission, our country is
practically as vulnerable today as it was on 9/10. Our seaports are wide
open, our airspace is not secure except for the nation's capital, and little
has been done about securing the nuclear bomb materials lying around in the
world. They give the administration D's and F's in most categories of
defending against terrorist attack.

Our adventure in Iraq, at a cost of trillions, has brought that country to
the verge of civil war while earning us more enemies than ever before. And
tax money earmarked for security is being dumped into pork barrel projects
anywhere somebody wants their own SWAT team. Detonation of a nuclear bomb
within our borders -- pick any big city -- is a real possibility, as much so
now as five years ago. Meanwhile, many Democrats have conceded the very
subject of security and positioned themselves as Guardians of Our Forests
and Benefactors of Waifs and Owls, neglecting the most basic job of
government, which is to defend this country. We might rather be comedians or
daddies or tattoo artists or flamenco dancers, but we must attend to first
things.

The peaceful lagoon that is the White House is designed for the comfort of a
vulnerable man. Perfectly understandable, but not what is needed now. The
U.S. Constitution provides a simple ultimate way to hold him to account for
war crimes and the failure to attend to the country's defense. Impeach him
and let the Senate hear the evidence.

............

Garrison Keillor's "A Prairie Home Companion" can be heard Saturday nights
on public radio stations across the country.)

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: