If people were able to stay there for themselves, they wouldn't need training to help a caller. Someone already in touch with their core being and their essence, which is to say in flow with their emotions, probably would do it instinctively, or need much less training. John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: On 10/5/07, Andy wrote: > Agreed, but this is reactive to someone else's emotions. It's actually > squelching one's own emotions. Up to a point that's necessary. Actually, no. The idea isn't to squelch your emotions. It is, instead, to recognize, objectify and use them appropriately. It's look before you leap; don't stay stuck and fuming where you are, let alone add fuel to the fire. As one of our senior trainers puts it, "Recognize the hot button, give it a name, put it to one side, and stay there for the caller." John -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Tel. +81-45-314-9324 http://www.wordworks.jp/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html --------------------------------- Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.