> > Well, the point I thought was obvious, namely that the Jihadists aren't > able to make the logical connection; they can't think logically -- or they > don't give a rat's ass about logic. The offense (according to the > Islamists) was that Spencer argued that Islam isn't tolerant, and isn't a > religion of peace. The Islamists responded by the fatwa "*"May Allah rip > out his spine from his back and split his brains in two, and then put them > both back, and then do it over and over" *which demonstrates Spencer's > point. Such a Fatwa is neither tolerant (they don't want Spencer to write > any more such books) and isn't peaceful. I find this amusing. My point is > that it is funny. This is one of the funnier sequences moving from the > offense (Spencer's books and articles) to the response (which proves the > point of Spencer's books and articles). > It's rather like the urban legend of the mother sighted in the Walmart parking lot with two small children. She was overheard saying "Quit [smack] hitting [smack] your [smack] brother [smack]!" just checking in at 3 months -- so far, so misera... err.... good paul