> [Original Message] > From: Mike Geary <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 1/25/2006 11:46:17 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Emotion and Politics > > AA: > > Just proves that war, especially an offensive war, is an emotional act, > > not > > a rational one. > > It proves no such thing. > Of course it does. Bush & Co. may have had rational reasons, if you consider greed a rational reason (I consider it emotional), but the support he drummed up was drummed up with fear, an emotion. WMD, run for the hills, etc. > > I think most human decisions are emotional. > > Do you think so or emote so? How do you know? You married your wife for rational reasons? Or was it for love? You divorced your wife for rational reasons? Or was it for some variation on an emotion? > > > Humans use > > their rational brains mostly for doing things like inventing, creating. > > But not writing posts. > > Sometimes they're rational for writing posts too. Sometimes they're not. > > Everything else is in the emotional, animal brain. I always thought if we > > did away with love, and just liked instead, the world would be a lot > > better > > off. > > I've always thought that if we did away with thinking we'd be a lot better > off. But there you go. > We can't do away with something that's never been done. Academics, crap like that there's plenty of. Thinking, not a bit, at least not where it counts. > Mike Geary > Memphis > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html