[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: UEB patches: Summary of issues with examples

  • From: Michael Gray <mgray@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:13:22 +0000

When I say I never tested them I meant I have never tested the effect of
mapping begcaps/endcaps to firstlettercaps/lastlettercaps. I have tested
firstlettercaps and lastlettercaps. I believe that begcaps and endcaps should
be deprecated.


MRG
mgray@xxxxxxx

________________________________
From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Davy Kager
[DavyKager@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 2:28 AM
To: 'liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: UEB patches: Summary of issues with examples

Problem: With the UEB patches, begcaps and endcaps appear to have no effect.

I mapped those opcodes to the firstlettercaps and lastlettercaps opcodes but
never had a chance to test them.

What are the semantics of these opcodes? That is, how do they compare to
capsword and capswordstop? Maybe begcaps/endcaps should be mapped to those
instead? I haven't tested firstlettercaps and lastlettercaps either, it could
be that they have the same behavior, which may very well be intentional.

Davy


Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. liblouis-liblouisxml
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2015