Hi Ken, As explained in the private email sent to you, Joseph and Attila when I completed the bitbucket git repo. The bitbucket repo is an exact clone of the one on github, except that you can commit to the repo. consider it as scratch space, i.e. table editors/authors can commit to it and I can fix things before the table has been completed/can actually be accepted into liblouis. @joseph > I'd be happy to fork a repo on Github just for table maintainers. it doesn't really matter if its github or bitbucket or anywhere else, so there is no real purpose in creating yet another fork. By using the individualistic fork model, collaboration becomes much harder, because the author is expected to complete the work on that branch, which is not the case in our situation. i.e. all three of us work on UEB when we find the time. I also ensure to push to bitbucket any changes that make it into master. Infact, you dont need multiple directories, you can just clone one repo, and add a second remote. I've helped Attila to do this, let me know if you need help. //should add it to the website. @ken, yes we have todo items for writing further documentation on the website. Please feel free to start adding things yourself, or draft something up and we can check it/post it once its okayed. thanks, Mesar On Tue 24/06/14,15:01, Ken Perry wrote: > > I have just been informed I am using the wrong git. Joseph I am using the > bit bucket git. I will go try the git hub stuff and see if it is any better. > Is the Bitbucket stuff still up to date or have we ditched that to? > > Brandon just sent me the new git link so I will run my tests again once I get > it. I will need to know the new rules for submissions. Where do I go to > read what all the new rules are? > > Ken
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
