Keith's proposal sounds fine to me. John On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 05:18:13PM +0000, Keith Creasy wrote: > John. > > Perhaps it would be better to post that we plan to make the change and then > allow a period of time for anyone to respond. If no one objects we then take > that as agreement. Probably should post it on this list and on the web site. > Many things are handled that way so that if, later on down the road, someone > complains or sues someone we can show that we made reasonable efforts to > inform and get a response. 90 days should be sufficient for anyone who > objects to respond. We also have to provide instructions for submitting a > response or objection so there's no confusion. Anyone who responds should > also be prepared to identify the portion of the LibLouis project they believe > they hold rights to. > > > I'm not an attorney but can't imagine that this wouldn't work. Many things > with much more serious consequences are handled in this manner. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Gardner > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:08 PM > To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: GNU license and MBraille > > Hello all, it would be a great help for anybody willing to volunteer a bit of > time to help us complete polling the list for permission to change the > license to LGPL2.1. Several months ago I wrote to all the people for whom I > had contact information asking for permission for such a change. > > Christian has dug out a few more addresses but many contributors are just > names on the list. It would be really good for everybody on this list to > review those names and > * if you are on that list, please respond with your agreement to change the > license, > * if you know anybody whose address is not given, contact them for permission > or send the contact information to Christian or me. > > All major contributors have agreed to the change. If there are any remaining > contributors who object to the change, we will remove their contributions > from liblouis so we can move ahead. We have discussed this issue thoroughly, > and there seems to be no good reason to object to the change, so I am > optimistic that we will not need to do any removals. > > Thanks! > > John Gardner > > > -----Original Message----- > From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christian Egli > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:03 AM > To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: GNU license and MBraille > > > On 01/13/2015 11:25 PM, Mesar Hameed wrote: > > In any case, Bert and Christian made a list of those that have > > contributed and need to give their consent. > Well Bert made the list really and John contacted most of the people on the > list. > > > Lets wait for an update from Christian (last person worked on this) to > > let us know how far through we have gone, and how many people still need to > > be tracked down. > Well, the whole process is tracked in > https://github.com/liblouis/liblouis/issues/26. Currently we have consent > from 57 out of 109 contributors. Someone should try to make an effort to > contact the remaining people (again, this time only asking for a move to > LGPL2.1 though). I'd be happy to help. > > Thanks > Christian > > For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages > go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com z + b z pj 0 Zv+Z b K- - > > - m X , \ -- John J. Boyer; President, Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com