I agree. I thought it was rather ugly until I saw one in person. Then I owned (own) one and it is an amazing camera. And quite beautiful to boot. My vote is for an R8/9 look but lighter. Aram> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:30:44 -0700> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> From: dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Design catastrophe> > Noel wrote:> > >I agree with Douglas about the catastrophic design of the R8/9, but > >I would like the R10 to be based on the R3,> > Hi Noel!> > Why is it that just about everybody who feels the R8/9 is a design > disaster are the folks who've never owned one?> > I too thought it a disaster when I fist saw it. But after using one > for several years, I learned to love it. It is the most intuitive > design I've ever seen in a camera. A delight to hold and use. It > even handles fairly well with the DMR ... though that does make it a > monstrosity for size and weight.> > And when you've used it loved it, you come to find it beautiful, as well.> > I'm glad you like your R3 ... my first Leica was an R3 and it's a > great camera. But I wouldn't trade my R8 for one!> > Cheers!> > > ---> > David Young,> Logan Lake, CANADA> > Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net> Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net> Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4> > > ------> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/> Archives are at:> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ _________________________________________________________________ Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/