In a message dated 11/27/2006 3:32:48 P.M. Central Standard Time, SonC@xxxxxxx writes: In a message dated 11/27/2006 3:14:48 P.M. Central Standard Time, tedgrant@xxxxxxx writes: >>From: David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> >>No matter what the reasons, there is a certainly a difference >>between Imacon's view and Leica's view of the world! See: >> >>http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/M8_DMR_Comp.htm<<<< Also, I was noticing that the time was about 15 minutes apart, and there was about a ten degree swing to the right, meaning that a larger proportion of the grass was available for WB sampling by the M8 In my opinion, the sky and grass has a nicer look in the M8 shot. In fact, if you run DCE Tools ColorCast FIX on the two shots, it says the M8 has no cast, and the DMR has a cyan cast. when you run it, the DMR grasses start to resemble those in the M8 shot. Regards, Sonny http://www.sonc.com Natchitoches, Louisiana Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane égalité, liberté, crawfish ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/