[karc] Re: RAC
- From: "John S - Taylor" <va3gst@xxxxxxx>
- To: <karc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:48:55 -0400
Phil,
I can't disagree with some of the things you listed but there is no one else
out there to take the interest in arguing for our bands.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Somers
To: karc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:16 PM
Subject: [karc] Re: RAC
> RAC is working in the background for all Canadian Amateurs.
Well in the background. I applied for RAC membership and paid on-line three
weeks ago, and haven't even received an acknowledgement yet.
No big deal. And I know they rely a lot on volunteers. But I think they
should do a big "rethink" about the effect that the cost and administration of
membership has on the small percentage of Canadian hams becoming and remaining
members. Other related issues: poor proportion of membership costs for
membership/magazine, lack of CD-ROM magazine (for blind members, and others),
high cost of membership, high cost for additional family members. I think they
should eliminate the magazine, put more news on-line, lower the cost of
membership and attract a much higher percentage of Canadian hams as members.
... Phil VE3HST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your
favourite sites. Download it now!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/2001 - Release Date: 03/14/09
06:54:00
Other related posts:
