Dear anh Dung (Luu), I think Mr. Nash was equating the 2 wars with respect to the effect they might have on this American society, i.e., the poor Blacks and Hispanics who usually are sent to war to die. His argument is more based on a social context than a political or ideological one. I think the argument has some merit, even when we think back to our Vietnam war, where most of the kids from well to do family usually found a way out of the draft and thus out of harm's way. I say this without any judgment or criticism toward the rich kids. It is just the way things work, as unfair as some of us may perceive it. I say it though with sadness and with a conviction to oppose this war, or any war for that matter. I see no purpose in killing people just to assert an authority, a power, or to further any ends. Simplistic as some thought my beliefs are, I can hardly see how we can otherwise justify losses of lives, properties, country, peace and happiness to the dictates of a few powerful people who hold our children's fates in their hands. In substituting the word "Iraq" for Vietnam", just as anh Khai has so well understood it, you are only asked to look at and compare the impact of the 2 wars on the 2 countries' social fabric. Mr. Nash is not a politician, he is an academic professor on the East Coast, and has spent his life working on great causes helping the poor immigrants and fighting for justice. Van