Re: Punctuation and JAWS
- From: "Yardbird" <yardbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:04:58 -0800
I agree, thoroughly. Why don't you compose a letter of suggestion to that
effect and email it to whichever FS address is the most appropriate for
submitting such comments? I'm not sure which address is the best one for
this, but... let's see which list we're on, here...okay, maybe Bruce Towes
can identify the right email address? So it doesn't get lost amidst general
gripes, pleas for assistance, and so forth?
Seriously. do it. Even if they're as busy as you generously speculate,
they need to know that this area of concern isn't quite taken care of, as
they might believe it to be.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Spratt" <A.Spratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: Punctuation and JAWS
Hi. We essentially agree in our approaches. Apparently like you, I'm
obsessed with punctuation, both in trying to understand what I'm reading and
in making sure my own documents are accurate. I think my position comes
down to this. FS in many ways has done a nice job of making the Net and
other text sources accessible in ways that enable users to focus their
attention on substance rather than process. To the extent that's not
possible, many visually impaired people, including myself, have become
accustomed to making adjustments and developing work-arounds. But the goal
ought to be to make JAWS as simple and as unobtrusive as sighted people
expect their software to be. The two types of adjustments I propose, adding
a pause after colons and semicolons and correcting the single-quotation
defect, would greatly enhance a JAWS user's experience. I understand that
FS must be devoting many of their resources to making JAWS work with Firefox
and keeping up with other developments on the Net. However, bread and
butter issues like these should not be neglected.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yardbird" <yardbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>I understand. I've just accustomed myself to hearing some punctuation
>spoken that other people might not like to hear, and if I doubt the syntax
>of a sentence or phrase at all, I just stop and examine it word by word at
>the place that worried me. I also have gotten used to figuring out when
>I'm reading something that's within single quotes somewhere like the Times,
>and so forth, somehow or other. I'm sorry. It really is a hassle, just as
>you say. These are just the adjustments I've made in order to accommodate
>these imperfections. But I'm serious that I really prefer to hear some
>punctuation actually spoken, though I regret the necessity eecisiity as
>much as any sane person would. But it's better than having jaws sail on
>and leave me befuddled, or settling for getting the "general idea." I'd
>rather hear my quotes and such spoken if need be. I just factor it into my
>reading experience and visualize it on the page and feel better, finally,
>not worse, thereby. And these preferences serve me well when I'm writing
>or editing. So it's not entirely tragic, just kind of a drag.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Spratt" <A.Spratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Punctuation and JAWS
>
>
> I appreciate your thoughtful reply. Still, the "most" or "some"
> punctuation
> setting question is a little different. I think of reading a long
> document
> on the Net where a semicolon can actually alter the meaning of a sentence.
> With a pause it would read one way, without a pause it reads another.
> Personally, I get distracted from the content when listening to
> punctuation
> marks being spoken. The single quotation problem is even worse, since
> JAWS
> doesn't speak words accurately inside them. I face that issue all the
> time
> when reading the New York Times, for example. What I find strange is that
> both problems ought to be simple fixes for FS. They know how to insert
> pauses after commas and other punctuation, and JAWS handles words inside
> double quotations with ease.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yardbird" <yardbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> Adrian,
>> this is just my personal preference, but I keep Jaws set to speak most
>> punctuation, from among the choices offered in the basics menu. which
>> means that I don't hear things like commas spoken, but do hear single and
>> double quotation marks spoken so that I am apprised that it's a quotation
>> or a quotation within a quotation that I'm hearing. This is essential to
>> me in a way it might not be for another user, I understand. As for
>> colons
>> and semicolons, I don't have jaws set to speak them, and I, too, regret
>> that they don't produce a significant pause. I think the only way to
>> really be sure what was happening, aside from reading word by word, would
>> be to go into the Configuration Manager verbosity section and get those
>> and other punctuation marks to speak, though I'd hate to do it. If
>> you're
>> writing something yourself, rather than reading what's already been
>> written by someone else, leaving two spaces after a colon (and even after
>> a period) in the way that seems to have gone out of fashion (a semicolon
>> has always required only one space following)helps to slow Jaws down
>> appropriately, to indicate the rhythmic nuance. But in my experience,
>> anyway, it isn't possible to simply have text spoken in the cadence that
>> accurately reflects all such punctuation, I'm afraid. What I describe
>> are
>> just some tricks I've had to learn to bear with because of this.
>>
>> sometone ,
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Adrian Spratt" <A.Spratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> I find it helps my reading comprehension when JAWS pauses at commas and
>> other punctuation. However, it doesn't pause after colons or semicolons.
>> Also, JAWS reads text well between double quotation marks, but not when
>> the
>> text is between single quotations. Does anyone have any suggestions how
>> I
>> can make appropriate adjustments?
>>
>> Or, as I suspect, are these limitations inherent in JAWS? In that case,
>> do
>> they interfere with other people's ability to comprehend what they read
>> with
>> JAWS?
>>
>> I've written several times to the FS suggestions email address, but
>> without
>> getting any response.
>>
>> --
>> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>>
>> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>> the
>> way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
>> the
>> list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date:
>> 11/18/2005
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date:
>> 11/18/2005
>>
>> --
>> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>>
>> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
>> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> the
> way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
> the
> list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005
>
> --
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
